<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating Wikiware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linuxneophyte.com/evaluating-wikiware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linuxneophyte.com/evaluating-wikiware/</link>
	<description>Trials of a Linux Newb.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://linuxneophyte.com/evaluating-wikiware/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linuxneophyte.com/evaluating-wikiware/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used both Twiki and MediaWiki. I ended up opting for MediaWiki because (believe it or not) the Twiki VM looked like hell. I don&#039;t mean there was anything wrong with it, just that there was a lot of sample data and example pages and I just didn&#039;t have enough time that day to remove it all AND learn how to set up user accounts and permissions.

We&#039;ve been running MediaWiki on a couple of sites for a few months now and it&#039;s pretty good. The two things I don&#039;t like about it is that it&#039;s fairly slow compared to other wikis I&#039;ve used (to be expected since it&#039;s a big pig of a wiki) and much of the configuration and customization has to be done by hacking the config files. I was surprised at that - I had thought that since MediaWiki was so big and bad that it would have more of a configuration GUI.

My 0.02.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used both Twiki and MediaWiki. I ended up opting for MediaWiki because (believe it or not) the Twiki VM looked like hell. I don&#8217;t mean there was anything wrong with it, just that there was a lot of sample data and example pages and I just didn&#8217;t have enough time that day to remove it all AND learn how to set up user accounts and permissions.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been running MediaWiki on a couple of sites for a few months now and it&#8217;s pretty good. The two things I don&#8217;t like about it is that it&#8217;s fairly slow compared to other wikis I&#8217;ve used (to be expected since it&#8217;s a big pig of a wiki) and much of the configuration and customization has to be done by hacking the config files. I was surprised at that &#8211; I had thought that since MediaWiki was so big and bad that it would have more of a configuration GUI.</p>
<p>My 0.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

